In this article 15 sections
- Why decoration gets passed through at cost
- The two parts of every decoration charge
- Screen printing
- Embroidery
- DTG and DTF
- Sublimation
- Where the margin leaks
- Leak 1: Setup charged at cost, or waived
- Leak 2: One blended price per piece
- Leak 3: Extras that never reach the quote
- Leak 4: The wrong quantity breaks
- How to price decoration properly
- An illustrative example
- Where an agent fits
- Margin Agent (proposed build)

Decoration pricing leaks margin when setup and run charges are passed through at cost or folded into one blended price per piece. Price decoration as its own lines, a one-time setup charge and a per-piece run charge, each with its own markup, and you can see and protect the margin on the part of the job that often carries the most cost.
Why decoration gets passed through at cost
A familiar pattern: a shop quotes polo shirts, applies its usual markup to the garment, then adds the screen printing or embroidery at roughly what the decorator charges. It feels fair. Someone else is doing the decorating, so why mark it up?
Because decoration is real cost on every decorated job, and your shop carries the work around it: artwork preparation, proofs, colour matching, chasing and quality checks. Margin you never price is margin you never see.
The two parts of every decoration charge
Every decoration method has a one-time setup part and a per-piece run part. The names and drivers differ by method.
Screen printing
- Setup: one screen per colour per print location. A two-colour front and a one-colour back is three screens.
- Run: a charge per piece that rises with the number of colours and locations.
Embroidery
- Setup: digitizing the logo once, more for detailed designs.
- Run: a charge per piece driven by stitch count and the number of locations.
DTG and DTF
- Setup: little or none, but file preparation time is real.
- Run: a charge per piece driven by print size, plus pretreatment on DTG, which is easy to forget.
Sublimation
- Setup: colour profiling for a new substrate.
- Run: a charge per piece driven by coverage, plus transfer paper and ink.
Where the margin leaks
Leak 1: Setup charged at cost, or waived
“I will waive the setup if you order 500.” It sounds generous. The setup still costs you, so it comes straight out of the job’s profit.
Leak 2: One blended price per piece
When the garment and the decoration become one number, you cannot see how much margin is on each. If the decoration part is near cost, the blended price hides it.
Leak 3: Extras that never reach the quote
Pretreatment, embroidery backing, colour matching, oversize prints and extra proof rounds are real costs. When they are not lines on the quote, they turn up as surprises on the decorator’s invoice.
Leak 4: The wrong quantity breaks
Garment prices and decoration run charges often break at different quantities. Applying the garment’s breaks to decoration can over-discount it, and setup does not get cheaper at volume at all.
How to price decoration properly
- Give setup its own line and its own markup. Charge it on every job, and decide when you will genuinely waive it.
- Give the run charge its own line and its own markup. The customer sees a garment price and a decoration price.
- Set a minimum decoration charge. A small run still needs the same setup.
- Charge for the work you do. Artwork preparation, colour separations and extra proof rounds are part of the job.
An illustrative example
Here is one made-up job to show the effect. The figures are illustrative, not market averages and not a customer result: 500 shirts, garment cost 4.50 each with a 45% markup, a screen printing setup that costs 50.00 and a run charge that costs 1.80 per piece. Figures are in US dollars and exclude tax.
| Decoration near cost | Decoration with its own markup | |
|---|---|---|
| Garment, 500 at 6.53 | 3,265.00 | 3,265.00 |
| Setup | 55.00 (10% markup) | 75.00 (50% markup) |
| Run charge, 500 pieces | 950.00 at 1.90 (about 6% markup) | 1,260.00 at 2.52 (40% markup) |
| Quote total | 4,270.00 | 4,600.00 |
| Total cost | 3,200.00 | 3,200.00 |
| Gross profit | 1,070.00 | 1,400.00 |
| Gross margin | 25.1% | 30.4% |
The garment price did not change. The difference is entirely in the decoration lines. The worked automated quote example shows the same method on an embroidery job, with a CSV you can download.
If you use the TaggIQ platform, tier pricing is part of it.
Where an agent fits
You can start with one custom AI agent around the tools you already use. The TaggIQ platform is optional.
Margin Agent (proposed build)
For your shop, we could build a Margin Agent that compares each draft quote with your margin floor and your decoration charges, and flags a setup fee or stitch band that does not match the job. It never changes a price and it does not invent costs. It explains what looks wrong, and your team decides.
If margin on decorated jobs is the job you would hand over first, the assessment below is where we look at it with you.
Prakash
Founder of TaggIQ. He built POS, commerce and AI platforms at Toast and VMware/Broadcom, and is building AI agents and an AI-native platform for print, promo, sign and embroidery shops from close trade conversations and workflow research.